Current Cases

— Courts

  • The ICC Appeals Chamber’s problematic approach to identifying evidence obtained in violation of human rights

    In this third opinion piece examining the ICC’s approach to evidence in the Bemba et al. case, International Criminal Justice Clinic student Ellen Leishman raises concern regarding the Court’s failure to determine the admissibility of evidence consistently with internationally recognized human rights.

    Read more
  • Admitting mistakes on admitting evidence – It’s not too late for the ICC to get it right.

    Building on initial concerns about the ICC’s approach to evidence in the Bemba et al. Appeals Chamber judgment, Chiara Loiero, Legal Assistant at Amnesty International’s Centre for International Justice, criticizes the ICC’s emerging practice of deferring any consideration on admission of evidence until deliberating the judgment.

    Read more
  • Don’t ask and you won’t receive – Will the ICC request the resources it needs in 2019?

    Drawing on their long experience of following the ICC’s annual budget process, Matt Cannock - Head of Amnesty’s Centre for International Justice - and Legal Adviser Jonathan O’Donohue call for a new approach in 2019, starting with the ICC putting forward a request that actually reflects its resource needs.

    Read more
  • Evidence of sexual violence against men and boys rejected in Ongwen

    Guest opinion piece writer Dr. Rosemary Grey, Amnesty’s Legal Adviser Jonathan O’Donohue and International Criminal Justice Clinic student Leonard Krasny reflect on the Trial Chamber’s recent decision to reject requests by victims’ lawyers for three victims to present evidence of sexual violence against boys and men.

    Read more
  • Appeal judgment raises serious questions regarding the fairness of the ICC’s approach to evidence

    Legal Adviser Jonathan O’Donohue provides an initial reaction to last Thursday’s summary judgment by the ICC Appeals Chamber confirming the conviction of five persons for offences against the administration of justice in the Bemba case.

    Read more
  • The ICC must become a champion of justice over abuse of power

    Legal Adviser Jonathan O’Donohue reflects on the 20th anniversary of the Rome Statute not as a time for celebration but a crisis point for international justice that demands robust action by the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    Read more
  • Laurent Gbagbo, interim release, and the ‘interests of justice’

    Chiara Loiero, Legal Assistant at Amnesty International’s Centre for International Justice, considers the ICC Appeals Chamber’s recent decision to reject Laurent Gbagbo’s notice of appeal against Trial Chamber I’s latest refusal to grant him interim release during his trial.

    Read more
  • Al Mahdi case: women and girls must not be excluded from reparation

    Adrienne Ringin, a student of University of Melbourne Law School’s International Criminal Justice Clinic, highlights important gender concerns arising in the International Criminal Court’s third reparations order. The piece includes input from Amnesty International’s Mali team.

    Read more
  • Time for the ICC to Rethink Its Approach to Victims’ Legal Representation

    In this first guest opinion piece, Michael Adams and Liz Evenson discuss the key findings of Human Rights Watch’s recent report: Who Will Stand for Us? Victims’ Legal Representation at the ICC in the Ongwen Case and Beyond.

    Read more

Sorry

De versie van de browser die je gebruikt is verouderd en wordt niet ondersteund.
Upgrade je browser om de website optimaal te gebruiken.